Project Daylight
LIVE Adaora Nnamdi published: SBA Office of Advocacy Expansion and Planned Parenthood Loan Review: A Regulatory and Enfo… · 3177 entries on record · 361 items on the plan · day 40
The Record · Foreign Policy · D95DC04B
critical / Foreign Policy

USAGM Independence: The Firewall That Protected Credibility Is Already Gone (But Can Be Restored)

Routed by Priya Shah · Chapter 9 (pp 282-283) → peace-diplomat Section reviewed by Elena Park · "Solid entry. Source is correctly characterized, the regulatory history is accurate (the 2020 repeal of the firewall rule), and the reframe properly balances efficiency vs. independence. No domain-specific errors found." Reviewed by Teresa Calderón · "Good, grounded piece, but the title over-claims (the firewall was regulatory, not statutory; it can be restored). Severity should be 'critical' — the loss of editorial independence directly threatens the credibility and security of these networks, which is a constitutional-level harm to free press and democratic soft power."

Project 2025's endnotes on USAGM call for consolidating oversight and ending editorial protections. The key action — rescinding the statutory 'firewall' that guaranteed editorial independence at Voice of America and other networks — was already executed in December 2020 by Trump-appointed CEO Michael Pack. That regulatory repeal remains in effect, leaving USAGM networks vulnerable to direct political control and undermining their credibility as a source of objective news in authoritarian-controlled information spaces.

The Project 2025 endnotes on the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) frame editorial independence rules as bureaucratic obstacles to a coherent 'America first' message. They are not wrong that consolidation can improve efficiency; it is the purpose behind that consolidation that matters. The 2020 repeal of the firewall regulation — implemented via Federal Register notice — removed the statutory bar that prevented political appointees from directing coverage, hiring, or firing based on content. That was the guardrail. It is gone.

Without that firewall, Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, and Radio Free Asia become de facto state media. When audiences in Iran, China, Russia, or Venezuela suspect that what they hear is filtered through a partisan lens, the entire value proposition collapses. These networks exist precisely because authoritarian states control their own information — and they need a source they can trust. Once that trust is broken, ceding that soft-power terrain is irreversible. China's global media investment, already outpacing U.S. public diplomacy spending by a wide margin, fills the gap immediately.

The rollback path is clear but requires political will. A new administration could issue a rulemaking to reinstate the firewall regulation under the Administrative Procedure Act — the same mechanism used to repeal it in 2020. Alternatively, Congress could codify the firewall in the Smith-Mundt Act amendments, making it statute-level protection that no single CEO could undo. Absent either action, USAGM's journalists remain vulnerable to political pressure, and the United States loses one of its most cost-effective tools for countering disinformation abroad without committing a single soldier or dollar of military aid.

Rollback path — how this gets undone

This action has already been implemented. These are the concrete levers that could reverse it.

  1. Issue new rulemaking to reinstate the editorial firewall The incoming USAGM CEO must publish a Federal Register notice re-implementing the firewall regulation that was rescinded in 2020, restoring the statutory separation between political appointees and editorial staff.
  2. Reshape USAGM board composition via new appointments and legislation Congress should amend the International Broadcasting Act to mandate bipartisan balance on the USAGM board, and the administration should nominate career foreign service or journalism professionals rather than partisan loyalists.
  3. Codify the firewall in the Smith–Mundt Act amendments Congress can pass a stand-alone bill or add a rider to the next authorization bill making editorial independence a statutory requirement, removing the possibility of future regulatory repeal.

Original source — excerpted

project2025 Project 2025 ch. 9: Agency for International Development (pp 282-283)

"— 249 — Media Agencies ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Agency for Global Media, https:/ /www.usagm.gov/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 2. Ben Weingarten, “Security Failures USG Media Agency Prove Need to Hire Americans First,” Newsweek, August 10, 2020, https:/ /www.newsweek.com/security-failures-usg-media-Agency-prove-need-hire- americans-first-opinion-1523895 (accessed March 20, 2023). 3. U.S. Agency for Global Media, “Who We Are,” https:/ /www.usagm.gov/who-we-are/history/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 4. U.S. Agency for Global Media, “Voice of America,” https:/ /www.usagm.gov/networks/voa/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 5. Daniel Lippman, “Deleted Biden Video Sets Off a Crisis at Voice of America,” Politico July 30, 2020, https:/ / www.politico.com/news/2020/07/30/deleted-biden-video-sets-off-a-crisis-at-voice-of-america-388571 (accessed March 20, 2023). 6. U.S. Agency for Global Media, “Office of Cuba Broadcasting,” https:/ /www.usagm.gov/networks/ocb/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 7. Rafael Bernal, “Bipartisan Group Asks Office of Cuba Broadcasting to Rescind Layoffs,” September 13, 2022, The Hill, https:/ /thehill.com/latino/3641445-bipartisan-group-asks-office-of-cuba-broadcasting-to-rescind- l…"