Project 2025's Trade Chapter: Reciprocal Tariffs Without Labor or Environmental Standards
Project 2025's trade chapter proposes the United States Reciprocal Trade Act (USRTA) to replace WTO most-favored-nation tariffs with reciprocal tariffs mirroring foreign rates and non-tariff barriers. While correctly identifying Chinese practices like weak labor and environmental enforcement, the proposal offers no reciprocal U.S. labor or environmental standards—a glaring omission that treats workers and communities in both countries as expendable in the race to the bottom.
Project 2025's trade chapter runs a table cataloguing Chinese 'economic aggression'—including lax labor laws, weak environmental enforcement, subsidies, and IP theft—but proposes no U.S. labor or environmental standards in return. The USRTA would grant the President sweeping authority to impose reciprocal tariffs based on foreign tariffs and non-tariff barriers, bypassing WTO dispute resolution entirely. That bypass concentrates trade policy in the White House with no multilateral check, and the resulting tariff hikes raise consumer prices disproportionately on low-income households, per Yale Budget Lab estimates (2024). Nowhere does the chapter propose enforceable labor rights or environmental provisions in U.S. trade agreements as a condition for tariff reduction or market access.
From a fair-trade perspective, this is a catastrophic missed opportunity. The correct response to Chinese state capitalism is not unilateral tariff bluster that raises prices on working families—it is coordinated multilateral action paired with enforceable labor and environmental standards in all trade agreements. The USRTA's reciprocal tariff mechanism treats workers as collateral damage in a trade war, not as stakeholders with rights. An alternative would tie tariff reductions to verified improvements in labor conditions and environmental protection in trading partner countries, alongside robust domestic industrial policy to rebuild U.S. manufacturing capacity. Without such standards, the USRTA simply exports the race-to-the-bottom dynamic that has hollowed out American communities for decades.
Rollback path — how this gets undone
This action has already been implemented. These are the concrete levers that could reverse it.
- Rescind Executive Order on Reciprocal Tariffs (April 2, 2025) The President can rescind the April 2025 EO that imposed 10% baseline reciprocal tariffs; no statutory change needed since H.R.735 is not yet law.
- Defeat H.R.735 in Congress Congress can let H.R.735 die without passage, or pass a Congressional Review Act resolution if a rule is issued under the bill's authority; progressive members should oppose expansion of unilateral tariff power without labor/environmental standards.
- Amend USRTA to include enforceable labor and environmental provisions If H.R.735 advances, amend it to require that any reciprocal tariff reductions be contingent on verified improvements in labor rights and environmental protection in trading partner countries, modeled on USMCA's rapid-response mechanism.
Reversing it is step one. The forward agenda — what we build so it can’t recur — is in Answers to this entry →
Grounded in
- Project 2025 Mandate for Leadership Full PDF
- H.R.735 - United States Reciprocal Trade Act (119th Congress)
- White House EO: Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff (April 2025)
- ITIF: From Outside Assaults to Insider Threats: Chinese Economic Espionage
- Yale Budget Lab: Effects of Illustrative Reciprocal US Tariffs
- Wikipedia: Project 2025 overview
- Democracy Forward: The People's Guide to Project 2025
- Congress.gov: Summary of H.R.764 (116th) USRTA
Original source — excerpted
project2025 Project 2025 ch. 26: Trade (pp 811-815)"— 778 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise China/quotesingle.tabs Acts/comma.tab Policies/comma.tab and Practices of Economic Aggression Protect China/quotesingle.tabs Home Market from Competition and Imports Expand China’s Share of Global Markets Secure and Control Core Natural Resources Globally Dominate Traditional Manufacturing Industries Acquire Key Technologies and IP from Other Countries and the U/period.tabS/period.tab Capture Emerging High-Tech Industries that Drive Future Growth and Advancements in Defense Industry Lax and Inconsistent Labor Laws % % % Monopsony Purchasing Power % % Move the Regulatory Goalposts % % % Open Source Collection of Science and Technology Information % % Overcapacity Drives Out Foreign Rivals % % % Physical Theft of Technologies and IP Through Economic Espionage % % % % Placement of Chinese Employees with Foreign Joint Ventures % Price Controls to Restrict Imports % TABLE 5 Communist China’s Categories of Economic Aggression (Page 5 of 8) — 779 — Trade China/quotesingle.tabs Acts/comma.tab Policies/comma.tab and Practices of Economic Aggression Protect China/quotesingle.tabs Home Market fr…"