Parental-Rights Mandates and Voucher Expansion for Federally Run Schools
Project 2025 would require parental written permission for school staff to use a student's preferred name or pronoun not on their birth certificate in federal K-12 districts, and expand DC vouchers and create federal ESAs for DC, military, and BIE students. The name/pronoun policy and related executive orders are already enacted; voucher and ESA proposals remain on paper.
The parental-notification policy enacted via Executive Order in February 2025 and the OPM memo barring preferred pronouns in federal workplaces are already in effect, forcing teachers in DC, BIE, and DoDEA schools to out transgender students against their will or risk losing federal funding. This commandeers local educators as enforcers of a policy that medical and child-welfare experts say harms vulnerable youth by stripping them of privacy and safety. The Title IX final rule issued in April 2025, which redefines sex discrimination to exclude gender identity, compounds the harm by erasing federal civil-rights protections for transgender students—a 180-degree shift from the Biden-era rule that covered them under Title IX.
The school-choice proposals—unlimited DC vouchers and federal ESAs for all DC, military, and BIE students—are still on paper but represent a dangerous privatization bridgehead. Voucher programs like the existing DC Opportunity Scholarship Program have rigorous evidence of weakening public schools: they drain per-pupil funding while private schools are unaccountable for outcomes, often close without warning, and are not required to serve students with disabilities. The Heritage Foundation's claim that even a 10% ESA take-up would cost sending districts only 0.1% of their budget is contradicted by actual state experience—Arizona's ESA program cost $1.4 billion in 2024-25, far exceeding initial projections, and triggered deep cuts to district schools. For BIE schools, which already suffer from a 150-year history of federal underfunding and a 53% graduation rate, ESAs would funnel scarce dollars away from the very public schools that Native families rely on, without addressing chronic infrastructure gaps, teacher shortages, or the 30-point attainment gap the plan itself highlights. The correct response is to fully fund Title I and IDEA in these districts, enforce civil-rights oversight through a restored Office for Civil Rights, and invest in the public school improvements that every student—not just those who win a lottery—deserves.
Rollback path — how this gets undone
This action has already been implemented. These are the concrete levers that could reverse it.
- Rescind EO 14170 (Parental Rights Executive Order) The President can rescind the executive order, and the Department of Education and OPM can issue new guidance reversing pronoun restrictions and parental notification mandates in federal K-12 systems and workplaces.
- Reverse OPM pronoun guidance OPM can issue a new memorandum rescinding the Feb 2025 guidance and restoring pronoun fields on federal forms and workplace policies.
- New Title IX rulemaking on gender identity The Department of Education can initiate rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act to reinterpret sex discrimination under Title IX to include gender identity, reversing the April 2025 final rule—a process likely requiring 12-18 months.
- Congressional Review Act disapproval (if before rule effective date) If Congress passes a joint resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act before the Title IX rule's effective date (Aug 1, 2025), the rule can be nullified and the agency barred from issuing substantially similar rules.
Reversing it is step one. The forward agenda — what we build so it can’t recur — is in Answers to this entry →
Grounded in
- Project 2025 Department of Education Chapter (Mandate for Leadership)
- Trump Executive Order on Protecting Parental Rights and Ending Gender Ideology in Schools
- OPM Guidance on Federal Employee Pronouns (Feb 2025)
- District of Columbia Opportunity Scholarship Program (GAO Report)
- Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) Graduation Rates (National Indian Education Association)
- P2025 Tracker: Parental Rights Executive Order (Daylight)
- Rescission of Biden Gender Identity Rules (Title IX, April 2025)
- Heritage Foundation Research on Education Savings Accounts
Original source — excerpted
project2025 Project 2025 ch. 12: Department of Energy (pp 379-381)"— 346 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise surgeries without parental involvement does not reduce the suicidality of these young people and may even increase suicide rates. l The next Administration should take particular note of how radical gender ideology is having a devastating effect on school-aged children today—especially young girls. School officials in some states are requiring teachers and other school employ- ees to accept a minor child’s decision to assume a different “gender” while at school—without notifying parents. In California, New Jersey, and certain districts in Kansas and elsewhere, educators are prohibited from informing parents about children’s confusion over their sex if the children do not want their parents to know. Such policies allow schools to drive a wedge between parents and children. The next Administration should work with Congress to provide an example to state lawmakers by requiring K–12 districts under federal jurisdiction, including Wash- ington, D.C., public schools, Bureau of Indian Education schools, and Department of Defense schools, with legislation stating that: l No public education employee or contractor shall …"