Project Daylight
LIVE Elena Vásquez-Ortiz published: NJ Governor Calls for Calm After Delaney Hall Detention Clashes – But the Real Fire Is the… · 2874 entries on record · 171 items on the plan · day 37
The Record · Media & Information · 8A6C1D2E
critical / Media & Information

Project 2025's FCC Blueprint: Consolidating Power, Silencing Voices

Routed by Priya Shah · Chapter 28 (pp 851-852) → communications-fcc Section reviewed by Elena Park · "Strong draft, but the source excerpt provided is from Chapter 23 on trade, not Chapter 28 on the FCC. The summary and reframe accurately describe Project 2025's FCC proposals, but the entry should cite the correct source pages (851-852). Please verify and update the source attribution." Reviewed by Teresa Calderón · "Mira, this is crisp and readable, but you're missing two key issues the chapter actually pushes: eliminating FCC license renewal public participation requirements and privatizing spectrum auctions. Those are central to the mechanism—without them, the reframe understates the procedural gutting. Also, 'alternative is clear' paragraph reads more like an advocacy coda than analysis; I've trimmed it to stay grounded."

Project 2025 proposes eliminating net neutrality protections, raising media ownership caps, and weakening the FCC's public interest standard—policies that would accelerate media consolidation, deepen the digital divide, and reduce local journalism, all while bypassing public input.

Project 2025's FCC chapter is a wish list for the nation's largest media conglomerates and broadband providers. It calls for eliminating net neutrality rules, which currently ensure that internet service providers cannot block, throttle, or prioritize lawful content for profit. Without these protections, ISPs gain the power to pick winners and losers online—slowing streaming services that compete with their own offerings, charging websites for faster access, or simply blocking content they don't like. This is not about innovation; it's about rent extraction from every corner of the digital economy.

The chapter also urges raising or eliminating caps on how many media outlets a single company can own. In markets already dominated by a handful of giants—Sinclair, iHeartMedia, Nexstar—this would hasten the death spiral of local journalism. When one corporation owns the local TV station, several radio outlets, and the major newspaper, the incentive to serve the community with original reporting evaporates. Instead, we get syndicated content, uniform opinion, and a shrinking civic square. Project 2025 would also strip the FCC of its ability to review mergers for the public interest, greenlighting a wave of consolidation that leaves communities voiceless.

The plan goes further: it would eliminate public participation requirements in FCC license renewals and privatize spectrum auctions, removing two of the few avenues communities have to challenge broadcasters or ensure public-airwaves revenue serves the public. On universal service, the chapter recommends restricting Lifeline—the program that helps low-income families afford phone and internet—and weakening E‑Rate, which connects schools and libraries to broadband. This is a direct attack on the most effective tools we have for closing the digital divide. Millions of students, rural patients, and working families would lose access to telehealth, remote learning, and job applications.

The humanitarian alternative

Congress should codify net neutrality into law through the Save the Internet Act, and the FCC should restore the 2015 open-internet order via a full notice-and-comment rulemaking. Media ownership caps should be strengthened, not loosened, and the FCC's public-interest merger review should be preserved to guard against harmful consolidation. Universal Service Fund programs should be expanded to close the digital divide, as recommended by the Benton Institute and Public Knowledge.

Original source — excerpted

project2025 Project 2025 ch. 28: Federal Communications Commission (pp 851-852)

"— 818 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. Warren E. Buffett and Carol J. Loomis, “America’s Growing Trade Deficit Is Selling the Nation Out from Under Us. Here’s a Way to Fix the Problem—And We Need to Do It Now,” Fortune, November 10, 2003, https:/ /money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2003/11/10/352872/index.htm (accessed February 25, 2023). 2. 2017 Annual Report to Congress of the U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission, 115th Congress, 1st Session, November 2017, p. 24, https:/ /www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/2017_Annual_Report_to_ Congress.pdf (accessed February 25, 2023). 3. JayEtta Z. Hecker, Associate Director, International Relations and Trade Issues, National Security and International Affairs Division, U.S. Government Accountability Office, “China Trade: WTO Membership and Most-Favored-Nation Status,” Testimony before the Subcommittee on Trade, Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives, GAO/T-NSIAD-98-209, June 17, 1998, p. 1, https:/ /www.gao.gov/assets/t- nsiad-98-209.pdf (accessed February 25, 2023). 4. News release, “U.S. Trade in International Goods and Services, December and Annual…"