Project Daylight
LIVE Danny Moretti published: Newsom Return-to-Office Order Draws Unfair Labor Practice Charge · 4379 entries on record · 1124 items on the plan · day 76
The Record · Democracy & Institutions · 87D51CF5
concern / Democracy & Institutions

FEMA anti-terrorism grants weaponized to force election changes on states

Routed by Priya Shah · The content is about election practices under Trump administration pressure, which directly matches Gabriel Thornton's lens on ballot access, campaign finance, and election administration. Section reviewed by Elena Park · "Minor precision fixes: Voting Rights Act of 1965, not just Voting Rights Act; remove 'the' before Heritage Foundation. Tighten for clarity." Reviewed by Teresa Calderón · "The title and reframe are strong, but the summary flips from administration to FEMA as the actor mid-sentence and the severity 'serious' is not one of our standard options (should be 'critical' or 'concern'). Also, the Heritage Foundation database claim needs attribution — cite the specific Brennan Center analysis in the summary."

Trump administration is conditioning access to over $1 billion in FEMA Homeland Security Grant Program funds on states adopting voter ID and noncitizen purge measures, despite noncitizen voting being virtually nonexistent per Heritage Foundation data (as analyzed by the Brennan Center). A Brennan Center analysis of Project 2025 warns this mirrors plans to use federal agencies to criminalize routine election administration.

The June 2026 FEMA FY2026 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) makes more than $1 billion available for state and local anti-terrorism preparedness — equipment, training, planning. But the administration has inserted new election security conditions: states must intensify noncitizen voter purges and enforce voter ID laws to access these funds. This is homeland security money, not election administration funding. States that refuse risk losing hundreds of millions of dollars for actual safety programs.

As the Brennan Center has documented, Heritage Foundation's own voter fraud database — the same database the administration relies on — 'undermines claims of recent voter fraud' and shows noncitizen voting is 'virtually nonexistent.' A Brennan Center analysis of Project 2025 (the administration's roadmap) warns it would 'deploy the machinery of the Justice Department to investigate and prosecute election officials for doing their jobs — potentially criminalizing routine election administration.' The FEMA grant conditions are a backdoor way to force the same election restrictions that Project 2025 has long advocated, using homeland security funding as leverage rather than the Voting Rights Act of 1965's preclearance framework, which the Supreme Court gutted in Shelby County.

The alternative is straightforward: enforce the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as Congress originally intended, rely on the proven election administration tools that have kept fraud near zero, and keep FEMA focused on its actual mission — protecting communities from terrorism and natural disasters, not dictating election policy to states.

The humanitarian alternative

Congress should pass the Freedom to Vote Act, which would establish uniform national standards for voter list maintenance, preempt baseless federal funding threats, and provide stable, non-coercive funding for election administration. States should also adopt statutory election-firewall laws—like California's SB 73—that explicitly prohibit federal interference with state election systems and block coercion through grant conditions. The federal government's legitimate interest in preventing actual noncitizen voting can be served through existing, verified data-matching systems like SAVE and through mandatory, not coercive, state-federal cooperation protocols that respect state sovereignty.

Falsifiable predictions

What this entry claims will happen, and what data would prove it wrong. The Reckoner revisits these against current reality.

  1. At least three states will file lawsuits within 90 days challenging the administration's funding-withholding authority as a violation of the Spending Clause and federalism principles.
    Horizon: 90 days Falsified by: No states file such lawsuits or the administration rescinds the funding threat.
  2. By November 2026, at least one state will lose or have suspended federal election administration funding due to noncompliance with these demands.
    Horizon: 6 months Falsified by: No state actually loses funding or the funding threat is blocked by court order.

Grounded in

Original source — excerpted

news The Trump administration is ramping up pressure on states to change election practices

"Add AP News as your preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Add AP News on Google Add AP News as your preferred source to see more of our storie..."

Policy levers freedom-to-vote-actstate-election-firewall-lawsspending-clause-litigationdoj-oversight-hearings