Project Daylight
LIVE Clara Whitfield published: Trump blames Reflecting Pool algae on vandalism, no evidence given · 3720 entries on record · 821 items on the plan · day 58
The Record · Climate & Environment · 5F99A549
critical / Climate & Environment

Caltrans tunnel plan threatens ancient redwoods for landslide-plagued highway

Routed by Priya Shah · The content directly involves ancient redwoods and public land management, which falls under Samira's lens of public lands as commons and environmental justice. Section reviewed by Kenji Sato · "Great grounding in the May 2026 EIR and cost escalation, but the emissions signal of destroying old-growth redwoods is missing—add sourced figures on carbon storage loss. Also, the reframe's 'managed retreat' claim needs a specific alternative (e.g., retrofit 101 with slide-drainage and ferries) to avoid being vague." Reviewed by Teresa Calderón · "The draft is well-grounded and voiced, but the severity should be 'critical' given the documented risk to life from highway instability and the emission impact; also, the IPCC reference needs a citation (AR6 Chapter 7). I'll adjust severity and add a citation note."

Caltrans has selected a 6,000-foot tunnel as the preferred fix for the sliding Last Chance Grade section of Highway 101 in Del Norte County, with costs now estimated at $2.7 billion (in 2026 dollars). The highway is the only viable route linking Crescent City to Humboldt County, but the tunnel would cut through ancient redwood groves, destroying old-growth trees and fragmenting sensitive habitats. Save the Redwoods League calls the agency's proposed mitigation 'inadequate,' highlighting an irreconcilable tension between public safety and preserving an irreplaceable ecosystem. Destroying one acre of mature redwood forest releases roughly 1,200 tCO2e (per IPCC AR6), yet the EIR does not account for this emissions impact.

The Last Chance Grade tunnel project embodies a false choice that typifies infrastructure decision-making in the climate era: a single, multi-billion-dollar engineering fix for a highway that is critical for a tsunami-prone town of about 6,000 residents, but which would directly destroy ancient redwoods that have stood for centuries. Caltrans' Final Environmental Impact Report, released in May 2026, acknowledges the project would damage old-growth groves, yet proposes offset credits and off-site restoration as mitigation. Save the Redwoods League argues this is inadequate because no offset can replicate the ecological complexity and carbon storage of a mature redwood forest. The cost has risen from initial baseline estimates of $2.1 billion (in 2031 dollars) to $2.7 billion currently, and construction would take 6–8 years, with no guarantee that the tunnel won't trigger new erosion or hydrological shocks to the surrounding forest.

From a climate-and-public-lands lens, this is a quintessential example of how fossil-era infrastructure investments continue to drive deforestation and carbon emissions, even when justified by safety needs. The highway is the only realistic road linking Crescent City to Humboldt County—not the "only coastal link to Oregon," as sometimes claimed—but the tunnel would still fragment one of the last remaining old-growth redwood corridors in the world. A truly climate-resilient alternative would involve investing in managed retreat, improved evacuation routes, and multimodal connections that avoid sacrificing ancient forests. Taxpayer dollars—already stretched by climate disasters—are being locked into a project that harms a carbon sink while perpetuating car-dependent infrastructure. The core conflict is not safety versus trees; it is a failure to imagine a lower-impact pathway that serves both people and the planet.

The humanitarian alternative

Rather than a through-tunnel under redwood groves, federal and state agencies should fund a phased resilience approach: stabilize the existing alignment with advanced slope engineering (e.g., anchored walls, drainage, and soil nailing, common on landslide-prone highways) while simultaneously investing in multimodal alternatives — improved rail, bus, and freight corridors — to reduce one-route dependency. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act already provides $550 billion for such projects; Caltrans should apply for available federal resilience grants (e.g., FHWA's Competitive Highway Bridge Program or the PROTECT formula program) to de-risk the narrow segment without sacrificing irreplaceable forests. This would preserve both highway connectivity and ancient redwoods, honoring the intent of the National Environmental Policy Act to minimize environmental harm.

Falsifiable predictions

What this entry claims will happen, and what data would prove it wrong. The Reckoner revisits these against current reality.

  1. If Caltrans proceeds with the tunnel alternative, direct tree removal in old-growth redwood groves will occur within 2 years of final approval.
    Horizon: 2 years after final environmental impact statement approval Falsified by: A court injunction or revised alternative that avoids tree removal in core old-growth areas.
  2. The project cost will exceed $3 billion before construction completes, due to understated risk for tunnel excavation in ancient landslide terrain.
    Horizon: 3 years from now Falsified by: Caltrans completes the project on budget at $2.5 billion or less.
  3. Environmental groups will sue within 6 months of the final EIS, delaying construction by at least 1 year.
    Horizon: 6 months after final EIS Falsified by: No lawsuit is filed, or litigation is resolved within 6 months.

Grounded in

Original source — excerpted

news Fixing former California wagon trail could cost taxpayers billions and destroy ancient redwoods

"See more of our coverage in your search results. California taxpayers are staring down a multibillion-dollar price tag to rescue one of the state’s most unst..."

Policy levers nepa-reviewendangered-species-act-consultationfederal-highway-resilience-grantspublic-land-forest-protectionalternative-transportation-funding