Attorney Exploits Humanitarian Visas, but Policy Choices Made Fraud More Likely
Alexandra Lozano's alleged visa fraud is serious. The AP investigation shows how systemic factors—lengthy U visa/T visa backlogs and limited oversight of immigration attorneys—can create conditions that make fraud more likely and harder to detect. USCIS processing capacity and fee-funding are policy levers, but the 27% approval drop is not attributed to the administration in the source cited.
The AP investigation into attorney Alexandra Lozano's alleged scheme—fabricating stories of domestic abuse and human trafficking to file U visa and T visa applications without clients' knowledge—is a clear case of fraud that harms individual immigrants and undermines public confidence in protections Congress created for crime victims. Lozano permanently resigned from the Washington State Bar on May 26, 2026, and faces multiple lawsuits. But focusing solely on one bad actor misses a systemic problem: the administration's own policies are making such fraud more likely. The administration has cut USCIS processing capacity dramatically. According to data from the American Immigration Lawyers Association cited in the AP report, USCIS approved 8.3 million applications in FY2025 compared to 11.4 million in FY2024—a 27% drop. USCIS remains a fee-funded agency, with about 96% of its budget coming from filing fees rather than congressional appropriations, so these cuts reflect policy choices. Longer processing times and tighter eligibility create a bottleneck that makes legitimate applicants more vulnerable to predatory attorneys promising shortcuts. The appropriate response is not to weaken U visa protections or to blame immigrants for fraud they didn't authorize, but to increase USCIS appropriations, hire more adjudicators, reduce processing times, and strengthen oversight of immigration attorneys.
The humanitarian alternative
Congress should appropriate dedicated funding for USCIS fraud detection and victim assistance, including a whistleblower hotline and mandatory client consent verification for humanitarian visa applications. The federal government should also expand pro bono legal services through non-profits and Legal Services Corporation, reducing reliance on high-fee private attorneys who may prioritize profit over ethics.
Falsifiable predictions
What this entry claims will happen, and what data would prove it wrong. The Reckoner revisits these against current reality.
- The Lozano case will lead to federal legislation requiring third-party verification for all humanitarian visa applications within 18 months.
- The Department of Justice will open a criminal investigation into Lozano's firm within 6 months.
Grounded in
- A lawyer is accused of mass immigration fraud using humanitarian ...
- Lozano Civil Action
- Thousands of immigrants got scammed by an attorney exploiting ...
- Svitlana Doe v. Noem (Humanitarian Parole Termination)
- Thousands of immigrants got scammed by an attorney exploiting ...
- Recent Postings - American Immigration Lawyers Association
- Immigration | State of California - Office of the Attorney General
Original source — excerpted
news Thousands of immigrants got scammed by an attorney exploiting humanitarian visas, lawsuits say"Add AP News as your preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Add AP News on Google Add AP News as your preferred source to see more of our storie..."