Federal judges allow Tennessee map splitting majority-Black Memphis district
A three-judge federal panel declined to block Tennessee's redrawn congressional map, which carves up a majority-Black district in Memphis, citing plaintiffs' unlikely success under weakened Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act after the Supreme Court's 2025 Callais ruling.
A federal judicial panel has permitted Tennessee to use a new congressional map that dismantles the state's only majority-Black district in Memphis, effectively diluting Black voting power and paving the way for Republicans to capture all nine U.S. House seats. The decision, issued July 23, 2026, with early voting already underway for the August 6 primary, denied a preliminary injunction on grounds that plaintiffs were unlikely to prove the map was a racial gerrymander under the Fifteenth Amendment.
This ruling is a direct product of the Supreme Court's 2025 decision in *Callais v. Louisiana*, which weakened federal Voting Rights Act protections by requiring plaintiffs to show race was the 'predominant' factor in redistricting — a high bar that effectively greenlights partisan gerrymanders that target minority communities. The map, signed in May 2026 by Governor Bill Lee, splits Shelby County's Black population across three districts, diminishing their electoral influence and making the 9th District a white-majority Republican stronghold.
The outcome harms not only Memphis's Black voters, who lose a voice in Congress, but also the broader democratic principle of fair representation. The harm is immediate: the map will be used in the 2026 midterms, likely locking in a Republican supermajority for the decade. This is a concrete example of how narrowed Voting Rights Act enforcement enables state-level racial gerrymandering without consequence.
The humanitarian alternative
Congress should restore the Voting Rights Act's preclearance formula, struck down in Shelby County v. Holder (2013), and codify a clear standard that any redistricting plan with a discriminatory effect on minority voters is presumptively illegal, regardless of legislative intent. Alternatively, states like Tennessee could adopt independent redistricting commissions — as advocated by the For the People Act — to draw maps based on neutral criteria like compactness and community cohesion, not partisan advantage. Tennessee's current commission, dominated by partisan appointees, failed to protect minority representation. A truly independent body would ensure maps respect Section 2 of the VRA and keep communities of interest intact.
Falsifiable predictions
What this entry claims will happen, and what data would prove it wrong. The Reckoner revisits these against current reality.
- The redrawn map will reduce Black voter turnout in Shelby County by at least 5 percentage points in the 2026 general election compared to 2024, as voters perceive disenfranchisement and reduced choice.
- Within two years, at least one of the three Memphis-area federal lawsuits challenging the map will be dismissed or result in a stay pending appeal to the Supreme Court, given the high bar set by Callais.
Grounded in
- Federal judges allow new Tennessee congressional map - ABC News
- Federal judges allow new Tennessee congressional map that splits ...
- Federal Panel Allows Tennessee Congressional Map Poised to Give ...
- Federal court denies temporary injunction to block Tennessee's ... - WSMV
- Tennessee enacts new US House map carving up Memphis | AP News
- Congressional map redrawn: redistricting or gerrymandering?
- Judges Allow Tenn. Map Splitting Majority-Black Memphis Seat
- 2026 Tennessee redistricting - Wikipedia
- Tennessee lawmakers pass U.S. House map carving up majority ...
Original source — excerpted
news Federal judges allow new Tennessee congressional map"A federal judicial panel has allowed a new Tennessee congressional map that splits apart a majority-Black district in Memphis Two voters fill out their ballots..."