Hawaii justice signals defiance after Supreme Court gun ruling
A Hawaii Supreme Court justice used an 8-page concurrence to blast the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority for what he called a 'horror show' of anti-democratic rulings, explicitly stating Hawaii courts should resist federal Second Amendment interpretations that override state constitutional protections — though the concurrence carries no binding authority.
In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's June 25, 2026, 6-3 decision striking down Hawaii's concealed-carry restrictions, Hawaii Supreme Court Justice Todd W. Eddins issued a concurrence that goes far beyond routine disagreement. Eddins accused the conservative justices of constructing a 'wholesale assault on democratic governance' and declared that Hawaii courts should not automatically defer to the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of federal constitutional law when it conflicts with the Hawaii Constitution's protections for public safety.
This is not merely rhetorical heat—it is a concrete institutional challenge. By signaling that Hawaii courts may treat the Second Amendment as imposing a lower floor than the U.S. Supreme Court claims, Eddins is laying the groundwork for a state-level nullification strategy. If adopted by the full Hawaii Supreme Court as binding precedent, the state could continue enforcing its gun-safety laws in state court proceedings, forcing federal appeals that would provoke a direct confrontation over the scope of state judicial authority.
The move taps into a growing resistance toolkit: state courts asserting independent state constitutional grounds to blunt the reach of the current Supreme Court's conservative agenda. While Hawaii is a blue state with strong gun-safety majorities, the same strategy could be deployed by red-state courts on abortion, voting, or environmental regulation. The Biden administration faces pressure to back Hawaii's posture—or risk fracturing the federal judicial hierarchy that underpins all progressive policy wins.
The humanitarian alternative
Congress should preempt this escalating federal-state judicial conflict by enacting the Supreme Court Ethics and Transparency Act, requiring the high court to publish reasoned opinions for all orders and prohibiting the use of unsigned shadow-docket rulings in constitutional questions. Simultaneously, the Department of Justice should issue guidance reaffirming that states may enforce their own constitutions to impose greater protections than the federal floor—provided they do not directly violate explicit federal law—clarifying that the Hawaii approach is consistent with 150 years of dual-sovereignty precedent.
Falsifiable predictions
What this entry claims will happen, and what data would prove it wrong. The Reckoner revisits these against current reality.
- The Biden administration will file a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Hawaii's state-constitutional authority in the next Second Amendment case reaching the Supreme Court from Hawaii.
- At least two other state supreme courts (California, New York, or Illinois) will cite Eddins's concurrence in resisting federal gun rulings within one year.
Grounded in
- Hawaii Justices' Stunning Screed Against the U.S. Supreme Court
- US Supreme Court strikes down Hawaii handgun limits | Reuters
- Supreme Court Overturns Hawaii Gun Law - The New York Times
- Decision Alert: Supreme Court Strikes Down Concealed Carry ...
- A Sitting Judge Just Delivered the Most Scathing Critique of This Supreme Court Term
- GOP lawmakers urge Supreme Court to strengthen First Amendment ...
- Supreme Court rules against Hawaii in concealed-carry gun rights ...
Original source — excerpted
news Liberal circuit judge blasts SCOTUS conservatives, says Hawaii will defy high court"NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles! A Hawaii Supreme Court justice used a ruling overturning a decades-old criminal conviction to deliver a blistering..."